Export limit exceeded: 382017 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (12710 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2010-0076 | 1 Oracle | 1 Database | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Application Express Application Builder component in Oracle Database 3.2.1.00.10 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2010-0075 | 1 Oracle | 1 E-business Suite | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle HRMS (Self Service) component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2, 12.0.6, and 12.1.1 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2010-0074 | 1 Oracle | 1 Bea Product Suite | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the WebLogic Server component in BEA Product Suite 7.0SP7, 8.1SP6, 9.0, 9.1, 9.2MP3, 10.0MP2, and 10.3.1 allows remote attackers to affect availability via unknown vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2010-0072 | 1 Oracle | 1 Secure Backup | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Secure Backup component in Oracle Secure Backup 10.2.0.3 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the January 2010 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from a reliable researcher that this is a buffer overflow in observiced.exe that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors related to a "reverse lookup of connections" to TCP port 10000. | ||||
| CVE-2010-0071 | 1 Oracle | 1 Database Server | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Listener component in Oracle Database 9.2.0.8, 9.2.0.8DV, 10.1.0.5, 10.2.0.4, and 11.1.0.7 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2010-0070 | 1 Oracle | 1 Application Server | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Containers for J2EE component in Oracle Application Server 10.1.2.3 and 10.1.3.4 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2010-0069 | 1 Oracle | 1 Bea Product Suite | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the WebLogic Server component in BEA Product Suite 7.0, SP7, 8.1SP6, 9.0, 9.1, 9.2MP3, 10.0MP1, and 10.3.0 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2010-0068 | 1 Oracle | 1 Bea Product Suite | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the WebLogic Server component in BEA Product Suite 9.0, 9.1, 9.2MP2, and 10.0 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2010-0067 | 1 Oracle | 1 Application Server | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Containers for J2EE component in Oracle Application Server 10.1.2.3 and 10.1.3.4 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2010-0066 | 1 Oracle | 1 Application Server | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Access Manager Identity Server component in Oracle Application Server 7.0.4.3 and 10.1.4.2 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2009-4484 | 5 Canonical, Debian, Mariadb and 2 more | 5 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Mariadb and 2 more | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the CertDecoder::GetName function in src/asn.cpp in TaoCrypt in yaSSL before 1.9.9, as used in mysqld in MySQL 5.0.x before 5.0.90, MySQL 5.1.x before 5.1.43, MySQL 5.5.x through 5.5.0-m2, and other products, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption and daemon crash) by establishing an SSL connection and sending an X.509 client certificate with a crafted name field, as demonstrated by mysql_overflow1.py and the vd_mysql5 module in VulnDisco Pack Professional 8.11. NOTE: this was originally reported for MySQL 5.0.51a. | ||||
| CVE-2009-4030 | 3 Mysql, Oracle, Redhat | 3 Mysql, Mysql, Enterprise Linux | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| MySQL 5.1.x before 5.1.41 allows local users to bypass certain privilege checks by calling CREATE TABLE on a MyISAM table with modified (1) DATA DIRECTORY or (2) INDEX DIRECTORY arguments that are originally associated with pathnames without symlinks, and that can point to tables created at a future time at which a pathname is modified to contain a symlink to a subdirectory of the MySQL data home directory, related to incorrect calculation of the mysql_unpacked_real_data_home value. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2008-4098 and CVE-2008-2079. | ||||
| CVE-2009-4028 | 3 Mysql, Oracle, Redhat | 3 Mysql, Mysql, Enterprise Linux | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| The vio_verify_callback function in viosslfactories.c in MySQL 5.0.x before 5.0.88 and 5.1.x before 5.1.41, when OpenSSL is used, accepts a value of zero for the depth of X.509 certificates, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof arbitrary SSL-based MySQL servers via a crafted certificate, as demonstrated by a certificate presented by a server linked against the yaSSL library. | ||||
| CVE-2009-4019 | 3 Mysql, Oracle, Redhat | 3 Mysql, Mysql, Enterprise Linux | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| mysqld in MySQL 5.0.x before 5.0.88 and 5.1.x before 5.1.41 does not (1) properly handle errors during execution of certain SELECT statements with subqueries, and does not (2) preserve certain null_value flags during execution of statements that use the GeomFromWKB function, which allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via a crafted statement. | ||||
| CVE-2006-6697 | 1 Oracle | 1 Application Server Portal | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| CRLF injection vulnerability in webapp/jsp/calendar.jsp in Oracle Portal 10g and earlier, including 9.0.2, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via CRLF sequences in the enc parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2006-6699 | 1 Oracle | 1 Application Server Portal | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Multiple CRLF injection vulnerabilities in Oracle Portal 9.0.2 and possibly other versions allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via CRLF sequences in the enc parameter to (1) calendarDialog.jsp or (2) fred.jsp. NOTE: the calendar.jsp vector is covered by CVE-2006-6697. | ||||
| CVE-2006-6703 | 1 Oracle | 2 Oracle10g, Oracle9i | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Oracle Portal 9i and 10g allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript via the tc parameter in webapp/jsp/container_tabs.jsp, and other unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2006-7067 | 1 Oracle | 1 Database Server | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Oracle 10g R2 and possibly other versions allows remote attackers to trigger internal errors, and possibly have other impacts, via an "alter session set events" command with invalid arguments. NOTE: this issue was originally disputed by a third party, but the dispute was retracted. NOTE: this issue was called an "integer overflow" in the original source, but this might be incorrect. | ||||
| CVE-2006-7138 | 1 Oracle | 1 Apex | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| SQL injection vulnerability in wwv_flow_utilities.gen_popup_list in the WWV_FLOW_UTILITIES package for Oracle APEX/HTMLDB before 2.2 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL by modifying the P_LOV parameter and calculating a matching MD5 checksum for the P_LOV_CHECKSUM parameter. NOTE: it is likely that this issue is subsumed by CVE-2006-5351, but due to lack of details from Oracle, this cannot be proven. | ||||
| CVE-2006-7141 | 1 Oracle | 1 Database Server | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Absolute path traversal vulnerability in Oracle Database Server, when utl_file_dir is set to a wildcard value or "CREATE ANY DIRECTORY to PUBLIC" privileges exist, allows remote authenticated users to read and modify arbitrary files via full filepaths to utl_file functions such as (1) utl_file.put_line and (2) utl_file.get_line, a related issue to CVE-2005-0701. NOTE: this issue is disputed by third parties who state that this is due to an insecure configuration instead of an inherent vulnerability | ||||