Export limit exceeded: 401571 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (401571 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-94653 | 1 Apache | 1 Thrift | 2026-10-05 | N/A |
| Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity vulnerability in Apache Thrift PHP bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94652 | 1 Apache | 1 Thrift | 2026-10-05 | N/A |
| Missing release of memory after effective lifetime vulnerability in Apache Thrift c++ bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94648 | 1 Apache | 1 Thrift | 2026-10-05 | N/A |
| Allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability in Apache Thrift dart bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94645 | 1 Apache | 1 Thrift | 2026-10-05 | N/A |
| Improper validation of specified quantity in input, Allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability in Apache Thrift nodejs bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94644 | 1 Apache | 1 Thrift | 2026-10-05 | N/A |
| Allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability in Apache Thrift PHP bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94642 | 1 Apache | 1 Thrift | 2026-10-05 | N/A |
| Uncaught exception vulnerability in Apache Thrift PHP bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94639 | 1 Apache | 1 Thrift | 2026-10-05 | N/A |
| improper handling of exceptional conditions, Allocation of resources without limits or throttling, Uncaught exception vulnerability in Apache Thrift Java bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94638 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 2 Thrift, Hummingbird | 2026-10-05 | 5.3 Medium |
| Allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability in Apache Thrift PHP bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94637 | 1 Apache | 1 Thrift | 2026-10-05 | 7.5 High |
| Improper handling of highly compressed data (data amplification) vulnerability in Apache Thrift Go bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82041 | 1 Utmstack | 1 Utmstack | 2026-10-05 | 9.9 Critical |
| UTMStack before 11.2.16 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in UTMIncidentCommandWebsocket.processCommand(), the handler mapped to the /command/{hostname} STOMP destination, where no role check or command allowlist is applied before forwarding supplied commands. Any authenticated user, regardless of role, can send arbitrary operating-system commands over gRPC to any connected agent, resulting in command execution on monitored endpoints where agent processes commonly run as root or SYSTEM. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71892 | 1 Legion Of The Bouncy Castle Inc. | 2 Bc-fja, Bc-java | 2026-10-05 | N/A |
| In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, the opt-in key-size validation on CMS key-transport recipients, org.bouncycastle.cms.jcajce.JceKeyTransRecipient.setKeySizeValidation(true), never ran for a message using RFC 9709 content-encryption key derivation (id-alg-cek-hkdf-sha256). The branch that should have selected the actual content-encryption algorithm carried in the key derivation AlgorithmIdentifier's parameters compared the encrypted-key byte array against the id-alg-cek-hkdf-sha256 object identifier, a comparison between a byte array and an ASN1ObjectIdentifier that is false for every possible input, so the check fell through to a key-size lookup on the outer wrapper OID. That OID identifies a key-derivation construction rather than a cipher and has no registered key size, so the size comparison was skipped entirely. A key-transport EnvelopedData or AuthEnvelopedData whose transported, HKDF-derived content-encryption key did not match the key size of the advertised content-encryption algorithm was therefore accepted even with validation explicitly enabled, silently defeating the only mechanism the API offers for enforcing recovered key size. The recipient now dispatches on the content-encryption AlgorithmIdentifier's algorithm OID, so validation checks the recovered key against the inner content-encryption algorithm. Messages with a matching key size, non-HKDF messages, and recipients that do not enable validation are unaffected. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bcpkix-fips 2.0.13 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.13 (2.1.X series). | ||||
| CVE-2026-71889 | 1 Legion Of The Bouncy Castle Inc. | 3 Bc-fja, Bc-java, Bc-lts-java | 2026-10-05 | N/A |
| In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, neither copy of PKIXCertPathReviewer - org.bouncycastle.pkix.jcajce.PKIXCertPathReviewer nor the legacy org.bouncycastle.x509.PKIXCertPathReviewer - applied X.509 name constraints to the end-entity certificate. checkNameConstraints walked the path with a loop bound of index greater than zero, which is the bound the CA-only steps require, but index zero is the target certificate under the standard CertPath ordering, so the permitted and excluded subtree checks of RFC 5280 sec. 6.1.3 (b) and (c) never ran against the leaf's subject DN or its subjectAltName. A chain whose leaf violated a NameConstraints extension imposed by its own issuing CA therefore reported isValidCertPath() true with an empty error list, while CertPathValidator.getInstance("PKIX", "BC"), which shares no code with the reviewer, rejected the identical chain against the identical trust anchor. An application using the reviewer to make the trust decision rather than for diagnostics alongside a real validation accepted a certificate the constrained CA was never authorised to issue. Both copies now check every certificate in the path including the target, waive the sec. 4.2.1.10 self-issued exemption for the final certificate as sec. 6.1.3 requires, and skip the sec. 6.1.4 (g) constraint-accumulation step for the target. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.13, which carries only the org.bouncycastle.pkix.jcajce copy of the reviewer. It also affects Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bcpkix-fips 1.0.13 (1.0.X series), 2.0.13 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.13 (2.1.X series). | ||||
| CVE-2026-71888 | 1 Legion Of The Bouncy Castle Inc. | 3 Bc-fja, Bc-java, Bc-lts-java | 2026-10-05 | N/A |
| In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, the streaming CMS AuthenticatedData parser accepted a message whose digestAlgorithm and authAttrs fields disagreed about whether authenticated attributes were present. RFC 5652 sec. 9.1 pairs the two, requiring that authAttrs be present whenever digestAlgorithm is, and sec. 9.2 makes the MAC cover the DER encoding of authAttrs when they are present and the eContent OCTET STRING directly when they are not. CMSAuthenticatedDataParser has to choose between those two in its constructor, before it can reach authAttrs, which comes later in the SEQUENCE, so it chose on digestAlgorithm alone: for a message with digestAlgorithm absent but authAttrs present it verified the content MAC and then returned the attributes through getAuthAttrs() as though they had been authenticated, when the MAC had never covered them. An attacker able to modify a message in transit could insert an authenticated attribute, such as an RFC 2634 ESSSecurityLabel, into an otherwise valid message while holding neither the key-encryption key nor the content-MAC key, and an application taking an authorization, routing or labelling decision from those attributes would act on attacker-chosen values. The content itself remained MAC-bound. asn1.cms.AuthenticatedData now rejects the mismatched pairing when parsing and CMSAuthenticatedDataParser cross-checks the two fields once authAttrs is read. This is a variant of CVE-2026-59642, which bound the content to the MAC for messages that legitimately carry authAttrs, and which does not address this case. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.13, and Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bcpkix-fips 1.0.13 (1.0.X series), 2.0.13 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.13 (2.1.X series), and bcutil-fips 2.0.8 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.8 (2.1.X series). | ||||
| CVE-2026-61373 | 1 Apache | 1 Thrift | 2026-10-05 | N/A |
| Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in Apache Thrift Java TSaslNonblockingServer. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59661 | 1 Repasat | 1 Repasat Application | 2026-10-05 | N/A |
| Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in the Repasat application. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to trick a user into executing arbitrary code in the victim’s browser. The “nomRuta” parameter is affected – endpoint “/es/routes/update/693”. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59660 | 1 Repasat | 1 Repasat Application | 2026-10-05 | N/A |
| Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in the Repasat application. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to trick a user into executing arbitrary code in the victim’s browser. The “nomTransportista” parameter is affected – endpoint “/es/carriers/update”. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59659 | 1 Repasat | 1 Repasat Application | 2026-10-05 | N/A |
| Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in the Repasat application. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to trick a user into executing arbitrary code in the victim’s browser. The “nomZonaGeo” parameter is affected – endpoint “/es/geozones/update/149979”. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105130 | 1 Laradashboard | 1 Lara Dashboard | 2026-10-05 | 3.7 Low |
| LaraDashboard from 1.4.0 before 1.4.8 contains a race condition vulnerability in RegisterController::register that allows unauthenticated attackers to bypass the per-IP daily registration limit. Attackers can send many concurrent registration requests from one IP so all pass RegistrationGuardService::hasExceededIpLimit before recordRegistration runs, creating accounts in bulk and defeating anti-automation controls. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105125 | 1 Laradashboard | 1 Lara Dashboard | 2026-10-05 | 3.7 Low |
| LaraDashboard before 1.4.8 contains a path traversal vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to read JSON files by manipulating the {lang} route segment. On Windows hosts, attackers can send URL-encoded backslash sequences like ..%5C to escape resources/lang and read composer.json or other application JSON files. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105120 | 1 Openidentityplatform | 1 Openam | 2026-10-05 | 4.9 Medium |
| OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the sessions REST endpoint query operation that allows realm administrators to list sessions of every realm. Attackers holding delegated RealmAdmin privileges can supply a _queryFilter naming another realm to disclose usernames, universal IDs, and session handles across tenant boundaries. | ||||