| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The LDBserver service in the server in CA ARCserve Backup 11.1 through 12.0 on Windows allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a handle_t argument to an RPC endpoint in which the argument refers to an incompatible procedure. |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in the Arclib library (arclib.dll) before 7.3.0.15 in the CA Anti-Virus engine for CA Anti-Virus for the Enterprise 7.1, r8, and r8.1; Anti-Virus 2007 v8 and 2008; Internet Security Suite 2007 v3 and 2008; and other CA products allow remote attackers to bypass virus detection via a malformed archive file. |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in the RPC interface for the Message Engine (mediasvr.exe) in CA BrightStor ARCServe BackUp v9.01 through R11.5, and Enterprise Backup r10.5, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long argument in the 0x10d opnum. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the arclib component in the Anti-Virus engine in CA Anti-Virus for the Enterprise (formerly eTrust Antivirus) 7.1 through r8.1; Anti-Virus 2007 (v8) through 2009; eTrust EZ Antivirus r7.1; Internet Security Suite 2007 (v3) through Plus 2009; and other CA products allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted RAR archive file that triggers heap corruption, a different vulnerability than CVE-2009-3588. |
| Multiple buffer overflows in (1) RPC and (2) rpcx.dll in CA BrightStor ARCServe BackUp v9.01 through R11.5, and Enterprise Backup r10.5, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors. |
| Buffer overflow in the BrightStor Backup Discovery Service in multiple CA products, including ARCserve Backup r11.5 SP1 and earlier, ARCserve Backup 9.01 up to 11.1, Enterprise Backup 10.5, and CA Server Protection Suite r2, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors. |
| Multiple buffer overflows in (1) the Message Engine and (2) AScore.dll in CA BrightStor ARCServe BackUp v9.01 through R11.5, and Enterprise Backup r10.5, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors. |
| Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in Computer Associates (CA) BrightStor Hierarchical Storage Manager (HSM) before r11.6 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via CsAgent service commands with opcodes (1) 0x07, (2) 0x08, (3) 0x09, (4) 0x1E, (5) 0x32, (6) 0x36, (7) 0x40, and possibly others. |
| Multiple integer overflows in Computer Associates (CA) BrightStor Hierarchical Storage Manager (HSM) before r11.6 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified CsAgent service commands that trigger a heap-based buffer overflow. |
| LGSERVER.EXE in BrightStor ARCserve Backup for Laptops & Desktops r11.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via a value of 0xFFFFFFFF at a certain point in an authentication negotiation packet, which results in an out-of-bounds read. |
| Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in Computer Associates (CA) BrightStor Hierarchical Storage Manager (HSM) before r11.6 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified CsAgent service commands with certain opcodes, related to missing validation of a length parameter. |
| Multiple command handlers in CA (Computer Associates) BrightStor ARCserve Backup for Laptops and Desktops r11.0 through r11.5 do not verify if a peer is authenticated, which allows remote attackers to add and delete users, and start client restores. |
| Directory traversal vulnerability in rxRPC.dll in CA (Computer Associates) BrightStor ARCserve Backup for Laptops and Desktops r11.0 through r11.5 allows remote attackers to upload and overwrite arbitrary files via a ..\ (dot dot backslash) sequence in the destination filename argument to sub-function 8 in the rxrReceiveFileFromServer command. |
| Integer overflow in CA (Computer Associates) BrightStor ARCserve Backup for Laptops and Desktops r11.0 through r11.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long username and a certain "useless" password. |
| LGSERVER.EXE in BrightStor Mobile Backup 4.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (disk consumption and daemon hang) via a value of 0xFFFFFF7F at a certain point in an authentication negotiation packet, which writes a large amount of data to a .USX file in CA_BABLDdata\Server\data\transfer\. |
| Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in CA (Computer Associates) BrightStor ARCserve Backup for Laptops and Desktops r11.0 through r11.5 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long (1) username or (2) password to the rxrLogin command in rxRPC.dll, or a long (3) username argument to the GetUserInfo function. |
| Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in Computer Associates (CA) Alert Notification Service (Alert.exe) 8.1.586.0, 8.0.450.0, and 7.1.758.0, as used in multiple CA products including Anti-Virus for the Enterprise 7.1 through r11.1 and Threat Manager for the Enterprise 8.1 and r8, allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via crafted RPC requests. |
| Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the RPC implementation in alert.exe before 8.0.255.0 in CA (formerly Computer Associates) Alert Notification Server, as used in Threat Manager for the Enterprise, Protection Suites, certain BrightStor ARCserve products, and BrightStor Enterprise Backup, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by sending certain data to unspecified RPC procedures. |
| CA ERwin Data Model Validator (formerly AllFusion Data Model Validator) allows remote attackers to (1) cause a denial of service (application hang) via a malformed .EXP database file and (2) cause a denial of service (aaplication crash) via a crafted .EXP database file, which triggers a NULL dereference. |
| Buffer overflow in LICRCMD.EXE in CA ERwin Process Modeler (formerly AllFusion Process Modeler) 7.1 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long filename. NOTE: the researcher does not suggest any circumstances in which the filename would come from an untrusted source, and therefore perhaps the issue does not cross privilege boundaries and should not be included in CVE. |
