Export limit exceeded: 24818 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (24818 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-62797 | 1 Microsoft | 26 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 23 more | 2026-08-17 | 7.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows NTFS allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-62816 | 1 Microsoft | 26 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 23 more | 2026-08-17 | 8.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Reliable Multicast Transport Driver (RMCAST) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over an adjacent network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-62876 | 1 Microsoft | 26 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 23 more | 2026-08-17 | 7.8 High |
| Out-of-bounds read in Windows Win32K allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-62877 | 1 Microsoft | 26 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 23 more | 2026-08-17 | 7.8 High |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Windows Win32K allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-62890 | 1 Microsoft | 26 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 23 more | 2026-08-17 | 7.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows GDI+ allows an authorized attacker to execute code locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-62894 | 1 Microsoft | 21 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 18 more | 2026-08-17 | 7.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows DWM Core Library allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65662 | 1 Microsoft | 26 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 23 more | 2026-08-17 | 5.5 Medium |
| Out-of-bounds read in Windows GDI allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65671 | 1 Microsoft | 25 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 22 more | 2026-08-17 | 7.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Remote Access API allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65672 | 1 Microsoft | 11 Windows 11 23h2, Windows 11 23h2, Windows 11 24h2 and 8 more | 2026-08-17 | 7.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Remote Access API allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65784 | 1 Microsoft | 26 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 23 more | 2026-08-17 | 5.5 Medium |
| Out-of-bounds read in Windows NTFS allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65786 | 1 Microsoft | 21 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 18 more | 2026-08-17 | 7.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Desktop Window Manager allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65787 | 1 Microsoft | 22 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 19 more | 2026-08-17 | 7.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Desktop Window Manager allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65814 | 1 Microsoft | 26 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 23 more | 2026-08-17 | 7.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Storage Port Driver allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66799 | 1 Microsoft | 26 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 23 more | 2026-08-17 | 7.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Key Guard allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-62842 | 1 Microsoft | 13 365 Apps, Microsoft 365, Microsoft Office 365 For Mac and 10 more | 2026-08-17 | 5.5 Medium |
| Out-of-bounds read in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-74287 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-08-17 | 9.1 Critical |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sctp: validate embedded address parameter length sctp_verify_asconf() and sctp_verify_param() only validate ADD_IP, DEL_IP, and SET_PRIMARY parameters against a fixed minimum size of sizeof(struct sctp_addip_param) + sizeof(struct sctp_paramhdr). This ensures the outer parameter is large enough to contain an embedded address parameter header, but does not verify that the embedded address parameter's declared length fits within the bounds of the outer parameter. Later, sctp_process_param() and sctp_process_asconf_param() extract the embedded address parameter and pass it to af->from_addr_param(), which uses the address parameter length to parse the variable-length address payload. A malformed peer can therefore advertise an embedded address parameter length that exceeds the remaining bytes in the enclosing parameter. Validate that addr_param->p.length does not exceed the space available after the sctp_addip_param header before processing the embedded address parameter. Reject malformed parameters when the embedded address length extends beyond the enclosing parameter bounds. This prevents out-of-bounds reads when parsing malformed parameters carried in INIT or ASCONF processing paths. | ||||
| CVE-2025-46373 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Forticlient, Forticlientwindows | 2026-08-17 | 7.1 High |
| A Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability [CWE-122] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiClientWindows 7.4.0 through 7.4.3, FortiClientWindows 7.2.0 through 7.2.8 may allow an authenticated local IPSec user to execute arbitrary code or commands via "fortips_74.sys". The attacker would need to bypass the Windows heap integrity protections | ||||
| CVE-2026-72310 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-08-17 | 8.1 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb: client: fix overflow in passthrough ioctl bounds check smb2_ioctl_query_info() validates the PASSTHRU_FSCTL response payload before copying it to userspace. The payload offset and length both come from 32-bit fields. The bounds check currently adds OutputOffset and qi.input_buffer_length directly, so the addition can wrap in 32-bit arithmetic before the result is compared against the response buffer length. A malicious server can use a large OutputOffset and a small OutputCount to make the wrapped sum pass the bounds check. The later copy_to_user() then reads from io_rsp + OutputOffset, outside the response buffer. Use size_add() for the offset plus length check so overflow is treated as out of bounds. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72446 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-08-17 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ALSA: usb-audio: qcom: reject stream disable with no active interface handle_uaudio_stream_req() resolves an interface index with info_idx_from_ifnum(), which returns -EINVAL when no interface matches. The enable branch and the response: cleanup label both guard against a negative index, but the disable branch does not: it forms info = &uadev[pcm_card_num].info[info_idx] and dereferences it. uadev[].info is a pointer allocated only when a stream is first enabled, so a negative info_idx on the disable path is unsafe in two ways: - If the card was never enabled, .info is NULL and &info[-EINVAL] is a wild pointer; reading info->data_ep_pipe faults (kernel oops). - If the card was enabled at least once (.info allocated) and the disable names an interface that does not match, &info[-EINVAL] points before the allocation; info->data_ep_pipe / info->sync_ep_pipe are an out-of-bounds slab read and, when non-zero, an out-of-bounds 4-byte write (both pipe fields are cleared to 0). That is memory corruption, not just a NULL dereference. The request is reachable from unprivileged local userspace over AF_QIPCRTR. Reject a disable request with no resolved interface, matching the guard the enable path already has. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72360 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-08-17 | 8.4 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/xe/pf: Don't attempt to process FAST_REQ or EVENT relays Currently defined VF/PF relay actions use regular REQUEST messages only and the PF shouldn't attempt to handle FAST_REQUEST nor EVENT messages as this would result in breaking the VFPF ABI protocol and also might trigger an assert on the PF side. (cherry picked from commit 1714d360fc5ae2e0886a69e979095d9c7ff3568a) | ||||