Export limit exceeded: 402953 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 14709 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (14709 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-56726 | 1 Zammad | 1 Zammad | 2026-09-26 | N/A |
| Zammad is a web based open source helpdesk/customer support system. Prior to 7.0.2, this vulnerability breaks normal ticket isolation boundaries between agents. Any authenticated agent, even one with no active tickets assigned to them, can view the titles, status, labels, and URL links of GitHub/GitLab issues attached to any ticket in the system. This allows an internal user to systematically view GitHub/GitLab issue data linked by other agents or administrators across the organization by simply querying random or sequential ticket IDs. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.0.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-56733 | 1 Zammad | 1 Zammad | 2026-09-26 | N/A |
| Zammad is a web based open source helpdesk/customer support system. Prior to 7.0.2 and 7.1.0, this issue concerns a lack of discursive validation within the authorization cascade. It has been determined that the system-level enforcement of access restrictions during the initialization of new identity objects exhibits a discrepancy: Under specific conditions, the granular restrictions of the access key being used are overridden by the latent authorization authority of the parent account. Consequently, this means that the intended separation of functional areas is nullified, resulting in an uncontrolled expansion of administrative discretion. Due to this potential integrity breach of the entire trust environment, an immediate evaluation of the authorization hierarchies is imperative. Impact An attacker can create new administrator accounts despite token restrictions. This grants full access to all system data (tickets, customers, configuration) and allows the attacker to take complete control of the Zammad instance. Abuse Scenario The vulnerability stems from a lack of synergy between the token-based authorization logic and the target system's functional authorization hierarchy, which allows for iterative escalation of the privileged access context. This issue is fixed in versions 7.0.2 and 7.1.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65828 | 1 Zammad | 1 Zammad | 2026-09-26 | N/A |
| Zammad is a web based open source helpdesk/customer support system. Prior to 7.1.2, the legacy destroy_form action on AttachmentsController deletes UploadCache Store records based solely on a user-supplied form_id without verifying that the requesting user owns those records. An authenticated attacker who learns another user's pending-upload UUID can silently remove temporary file uploads before the victim submits their ticket or article. This issue is fixed in version 7.1.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84464 | 1 Zammad | 1 Zammad | 2026-09-26 | N/A |
| Zammad is a web based open source helpdesk/customer support system. Prior to 7.1.2, zammad's External Data Source feature, used to look up records from an external system, did not properly verify whether a user was allowed to see a specific ticket, user, group, or organization before including its details in a request to that external system. An authenticated user, including one with only basic customer access, could exploit this by referencing another record's ID, and thereby view details of tickets, customer accounts, teams, or organizations that did not belong to them. This issue is fixed in version 7.1.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-63204 | 1 Zammad | 1 Zammad | 2026-09-26 | N/A |
| Zammad is a web based open source helpdesk/customer support system. Prior to 7.1.2, an authenticated user with agent permissions can supply an arbitrary AI analytics run identifier to the ticket summarize endpoint and receive the AI provider error message stored for that run, even if the run belongs to a ticket the agent is not authorized to access. The disclosure is limited to the provider error string; ticket content is not exposed. This issue is fixed in version 7.1.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-53627 | 1 Glpi-project | 1 Glpi | 2026-09-26 | N/A |
| GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. From 11.0.0 until 11.0.8, a low-privileged authenticated user can use the new API (v2) to perform update operations that the same user is normally forbidden to perform through the user interface. The API update flow does not consistently enforce the applicable authorization checks. This issue is fixed in version 11.0.8. | ||||
| CVE-2026-53625 | 1 Glpi-project | 1 Glpi | 2026-09-26 | N/A |
| GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. From 0.70 until 10.0.26 and 11.0.8, a technician can manipulate the authtype value through the API to change another user's authentication method. Under configurations using the legacy API REST interface or SSO logins, this can change a super-administrator's authentication method and enable account takeover. This issue is fixed in versions 11.0.8 and 10.0.26. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100305 | 1 Tduckcloud | 1 Tduck-survey-form | 2026-09-26 | 4.3 Medium |
| TDuck survey form through 6.0 fails to enforce form fill-in restrictions on the authenticated submission endpoint POST /user/form/data/create. Authenticated attackers who know a form's key can submit unlimited entries to any form, bypassing publish status, time window, quota, and per-IP restrictions to falsify collected results. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86857 | 1 Servicenow | 1 Servicenow Ai Platform | 2026-09-26 | N/A |
| ServiceNow has remediated an authorization bypass security issue that was identified in the ServiceNow AI Platform. This security issue, if exploited, could enable an authenticated user to access data within the ServiceNow AI Platform that the user otherwise would not be entitled to access, potentially enabling further unintended access. ServiceNow deployed an update to hosted instances, and ServiceNow provided the update to our partners and self-hosted customers. We are not currently aware of malicious exploitation against ServiceNow instances. We recommend customers promptly apply appropriate updates or upgrade to a patched release if they have not already done so. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88848 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Masterstudy Lms | 2026-09-26 | 4.2 Medium |
| The MasterStudy LMS WordPress plugin from 1.9 before 3.7.50 does not verify that a course a member asks to enrol in is covered by their membership plan, nor that the plan identifier submitted with the request is one they actually hold, allowing any member to enrol themselves into restricted paid courses outside their plan and beyond the number of courses it entitles them to. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93343 | 2 Webwizards, Wordpress | 2 Marketking, Wordpress | 2026-09-26 | 6.5 Medium |
| MarketKing plugin for WordPress before 2.1.72 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the marketking_admin_vendors_ajax AJAX action that allows authenticated attackers with subscriber-level access or higher to retrieve the complete vendor directory by sending a crafted AJAX request. Attackers can exploit the absence of capability checks in the vendor management action to retrieve internal user IDs, usernames, and email addresses of all registered vendors, exposing personally identifiable information to any logged-in user regardless of role. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75745 | 1 Adobe | 2 Aem 6.5 Forms Jee, Aem 6.5 Lts Forms Jee | 2026-09-26 | 10 Critical |
| Adobe Experience Manager Forms JEE is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-52743 | 1 Gocd | 1 Gocd | 2026-09-25 | 4.3 Medium |
| GoCD is a continuous deliver server. Prior to 26.1.0, the internal GoCD UI /jobStatus.json API does not validate that a requested server-assigned job ID belongs to the pipeline and stage named in the request. An authenticated user can guess job IDs and retrieve status for jobs in pipelines the user cannot otherwise view, including job names, state, progress timestamps, assigned agent IP addresses and UUIDs, and associated stages and pipelines. The response does not expose console output, artifacts, commands, variables, or configuration. This issue is fixed in version 26.1.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-68791 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Azure Machine Learning | 2026-09-25 | 8.6 High |
| Incorrect authorization in Azure Machine Learning allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57590 | 1 Apache | 1 Dolphinscheduler | 2026-09-25 | 8.1 High |
| A missing authorization vulnerability exists in the Task Group APIs of Apache DolphinScheduler. The affected APIs do not properly verify whether the authenticated user has permission to access the project associated with the target Task Group. This issue affects Apache DolphinScheduler: before 3.4.3. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.4.3, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84719 | 1 Redhat | 3 Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer, Ansible Automation Platform Inside | 2026-09-25 | 9.9 Critical |
| A flaw was found in the Ansible Automation Platform automation-controller. When a WorkflowJobTemplate is copied, the deep-copy permission sanitizer validates only the inventory, unified_job_template, and credentials of each cloned node and fails to check the instance_groups (and execution_environment and labels) that were preserved from the original. A user with organization workflow-admin permission but no role on the referenced instance groups can copy a workflow, become its administrator, and launch jobs pinned to instance groups they are not authorized to use — including the control-plane instance group — bypassing the InstanceGroup use_role boundary and causing attacker-influenced automation to run in the control-plane execution context. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71459 | 1 Redhat | 3 Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer, Ansible Automation Platform Inside | 2026-09-25 | 5 Medium |
| JobJobEventsChildrenSummary view has no model/parent_model. ModelAccessPermission.check_get_permissions() falls through (returns True) for any authenticated user. The view uses raw get_object_or_404(Job, pk) without DRF object-level permission check. Zero-privilege user reads event tree structure, event_processing_finished status, and enumerates Job IDs platform-wide via 200/404 oracle. Sibling endpoint /jobs/{id}/job_events/ correctly returns 403. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87720 | 1 Gerrit | 1 Gerrit | 2026-09-25 | N/A |
| Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in project name normalization (ProjectUtil.stripGitSuffix) and ProjectCache eviction logic (ProjectCacheImpl) in Gerrit Code Review versions 2.16.0 through 3.12.9, 3.13.0 through 3.13.8, and 3.14.0 through 3.14.2 allows an authenticated user (or an unauthenticated user if the repository was previously public) to cause unauthorized disclosure of private repository content and durable restoration of revoked project-owner administrative privileges via crafted requests using repeated .git suffixes (such as project.git.git) across REST APIs, Gitiles, or SSH Git commands. Because Gerrit strips only a single terminal .git suffix when constructing the logical ProjectCache key while JGit (FileKey.lenient) resolves the suffixed alias to the same canonical bare repository on disk, revoking read access or removing owner rules on the canonical project name fails to evict the cached alias ProjectState during the cache validity window, enabling reads of newly created private commits or writes to refs/meta/config. This issue is fixed in Gerrit Code Review versions 3.12.10, 3.13.9, and 3.14.3. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48412 | 1 Adobe | 6 Adobe Commerce, Adobe Commerce B2b, Commerce and 3 more | 2026-09-25 | 2.7 Low |
| Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker with high privileges could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated access to restricted resources. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48411 | 1 Adobe | 6 Adobe Commerce, Adobe Commerce B2b, Commerce and 3 more | 2026-09-25 | 6.5 Medium |
| Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker with high privileges could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. | ||||