Export limit exceeded: 402821 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (402822 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-103008 | 1 Elastic | 1 Elasticsearch | 2026-10-06 | 6.5 Medium |
| Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to Denial of Service via a specially crafted request that causes the server to construct and process a deeply nested data structure with no bound on recursion depth. Elasticsearch contains an uncontrolled recursion weakness in how it builds and serializes geometry values produced by scripted runtime fields. Unlike geometry supplied as text, which is subject to a nesting-depth limit, geometry constructed from a script's output is not bounded. An authenticated user with read access to a single index can submit a request defining such a field with a script that produces a deeply nested structure. Processing this request recurses past the available stack space, causing the affected node to terminate. The node does not recover automatically on all deployments and may require manual intervention to restore service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-106062 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2026-10-06 | 7.8 High |
| A heap-based buffer overflow was found in GIMP’s DirectDraw Surface (DDS) loader. When loading a crafted DDS image, buffer sizes derived from width, height, and pitch can be computed using 32-bit arithmetic that overflows. The allocated buffer is too small for the amount of pixel data written through GEGL (CWE-787), following integer overflow in size calculations (CWE-190). This may allow heap corruption and, in the worst case, arbitrary code execution in the context of the GIMP process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-104046 | 1 Redhat | 2 Enterprise Linux, Openshift | 2026-10-06 | 6.2 Medium |
| A flaw was found in SSSD (System Security Services Daemon). When Identity Provider (IdP) authentication is enabled, pre-authentication requests retain state in memory without being cleared or timed out. A local attacker can repeatedly initiate authentication flows without completing them, causing unbounded memory consumption. This memory exhaustion can lead to a Denial of Service (DoS) by degrading or terminating SSSD authentication services. | ||||
| CVE-2026-106589 | 1 Openbsd | 1 Openssh | 2026-10-06 | 2.9 Low |
| In sshd in OpenSSH through 10.6, in certain environments such as QNX 6 and SCO OpenServer 5, sshd-session can unexpectedly have root privileges. This is related to the GatewayPorts and StreamLocalForwarding configuration options, and lack of support for file-descriptor passing and unprivileged allocation of PTY devices. | ||||
| CVE-2026-106040 | 1 Kvcache-ai | 1 Mooncake | 2026-10-06 | 8.2 High |
| Mooncake Store master through 0.3.13.post1 contains a missing authorization vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to erase any object's disk replica via EvictDiskReplica and BatchEvictDiskReplica. Attackers reaching the coro_rpc master port can evict DISK replicas across all tenants, deleting objects whose only remaining replica is on disk. | ||||
| CVE-2026-80048 | 1 Redhat | 2 Enterprise Linux, Openshift | 2026-10-06 | N/A |
| A flaw was found in `sssd-kcm`. A local user or process able to connect to the `sssd-kcm` UNIX socket can exploit this vulnerability. By sending a large request length header and then stalling the connection, an attacker can cause the system to preallocate significant memory. This leads to memory exhaustion within the `sssd-kcm` responder, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS) for affected deployments. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105292 | 1 Chaterm | 1 Chaterm | 2026-10-06 | 5.9 Medium |
| Chaterm before 0.12.1 contains a login cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows remote attackers to inject login state by sending chaterm:// callbacks without OAuth state validation. Attackers can trigger a crafted callback with attacker-controlled userInfo from a web page, signing the victim into the attacker's account so default data sync uploads saved hosts, passwords, and private keys. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105186 | 1 Itsourcecode | 1 Online Admission System | 2026-10-06 | 6.3 Medium |
| A flaw has been found in itsourcecode Online Admission System 1.0. This impacts an unknown function of the file /new.php. Executing a manipulation of the argument schedid can lead to sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105182 | 1 Sourcecodester | 1 Online Reviewer Management System | 2026-10-06 | 7.3 High |
| A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Online Reviewer Management System 1.0. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /reviewer_0/admins/assessments/activities/btn_functions.php?action=update. The manipulation of the argument Title results in sql injection. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105178 | 1 Sourcecodester | 1 Drug Recommendation System | 2026-10-06 | 4.7 Medium |
| A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Drug Recommendation System 1.0. The impacted element is the function mysqli_real_escape_string of the file /Admin/add_symptom.php of the component Symptom Creation. Performing a manipulation of the argument txtname results in sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105174 | 1 Gerapy | 1 Gerapy | 2026-10-06 | 5.4 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been found in Gerapy up to 0.9.13. This vulnerability affects the function project_create of the file gerapy/server/core/views.py of the component Project Management. The manipulation of the argument project_name leads to path traversal. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier of the patch is 6e481078cfba6388a67ca2d9792288405019ba3e. Applying a patch is the recommended action to fix this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82162 | 2026-10-06 | 7.4 High | ||
| Dell Command | Configure (DCC), versions prior to 5.2.3.35, contain an Improper Handling of Mixed Encoding vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of Privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-106444 | 2026-10-06 | 4.7 Medium | ||
| Handlebars provides the power necessary to let users build semantic templates. From 4.0.0 until 4.7.10, Handlebars.precompile() uses quotedString() in lib/handlebars/compiler/code-gen.js to emit static template text into generated JavaScript without escaping sequences that terminate an enclosing HTML script element. When an application precompiles attacker-controlled template text and embeds the generated source directly in an inline script element, a closing script delimiter can end the element and cause following attacker-controlled markup to be parsed and executed. Ordinary server-side rendering and precompiled templates served as external JavaScript files are not affected. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.10. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76741 | 2026-10-06 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| Buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the affected interface of AOS-S. Successful exploitation could allow an authenticated remote attacker to cause a denial-of-service condition on the affected system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76745 | 2026-10-06 | 9.6 Critical | ||
| Memory corruption vulnerabilities exist in AOS-S that are reachable by an unauthenticated adjacent attacker. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76747 | 2026-10-06 | 9.1 Critical | ||
| Buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the affected interface of AOS-S. Successful exploitation could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to expose sensitive memory contents and cause a denial of service on the device. | ||||
| CVE-2026-104632 | 1 Gitea | 1 Gitea | 2026-10-06 | N/A |
| Gitea Actions blocks the jobs of workflow runs from first-time fork pull request contributors until a maintainer approves the run. The rerun path only required a run to be finished and built the new attempt's jobs without considering the pending approval, so when a user with Actions write access cancelled a run that was awaiting approval and then re-ran it, the new jobs were created as waiting rather than blocked while the run still recorded that approval was required. Cancelling and re-running stale fork checks is a routine action that does not involve the approval control, so where Actions is enabled and a matching runner is registered, workflow code taken from the fork pull request head could run on the repository's runners without an explicit approval. | ||||
| CVE-2026-104626 | 1 Gitea | 1 Gitea | 2026-10-06 | N/A |
| A user who can open a fork pull request can place workflow content with a shared run-level concurrency group into a Gitea Actions run that is awaiting approval. When a later run in that group cancels the blocked job, the run becomes terminal while still marked as needing approval. If a maintainer later approves the run, Gitea passed the already-cancelled job back through concurrency preparation, set it to waiting, and made it claimable by a matching runner, executing fork-controlled workflow code. Exploitation requires the maintainer's later approval action, Actions to be enabled, and a runner that accepts the repository's jobs. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103667 | 1 Gitea | 1 Gitea | 2026-10-06 | N/A |
| Gitea's container registry served blob downloads with a `Content-Type` taken from the media type declared in pushed image manifests, without a `Content-Disposition` or restrictive content security policy. A user who can push container images can publish a blob containing HTML and JavaScript with a `text/html` media type. When a victim who is authenticated to the instance opens the blob URL in a browser, the script runs on the Gitea origin and can perform actions as the victim, such as creating API tokens. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103670 | 1 Gitea | 1 Gitea | 2026-10-06 | N/A |
| When a Gitea Actions run was inserted, older runs in the same workflow-level concurrency group were cancelled without checking whether the new run still needed approval. Because fork pull request runs are inserted under the base repository, a user who can open a pull request from a fork could cancel trusted in-progress runs that share a concurrency group with `cancel-in-progress` enabled, without approval and without running any code. On self-hosted runners this can interrupt deployments and leave partial state behind. | ||||